Re: [HACKERS] Re: ICU collation variant keywords and pg_collation entries (Was: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATEand work_mem values) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Verite
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: ICU collation variant keywords and pg_collation entries (Was: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATEand work_mem values)
Date
Msg-id bcca46f1-6803-41e1-a2d6-0f990a4b33c6@manitou-mail.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: ICU collation variant keywords and pg_collationentries (Was: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: ICU collation variant keywords and pg_collationentries (Was: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
    Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Here are my patches to address this.

For the record, attached are the collname that initdb now creates
in pg_collation, when compiled successively with all current
versions of ICU (49 to 59), versus what 10beta2 did.

There are still a few names that get dropped along the ICU
upgrade path, but now they look like isolated cases.

Best regards,
--
Daniel Vérité
PostgreSQL-powered mailer: http://www.manitou-mail.org
Twitter: @DanielVerite

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Beena Emerson
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Default Partition for Range
Next
From: amul sul
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hash Functions