On 08.12.21 07:27, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I saw that Tom updated it within the last 12 months, which I took to mean that
>> it was still being maintained. But I'm okay with removing it.
> Yes, I saw that as of bf8a662. With 42 incorrect reports, I still see
> more evidence with removing it. Before doing anything, let's wait for
> and gather some opinions. I am adding Bruce (as the original author)
> and Tom in CC as they are the ones who have updated this script the
> most in the last ~15 years.
I wasn't really aware of this script either. But I think it's a good
idea to have it. But only if it's run automatically as part of a test
suite run.