Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Supporting non-deterministic collations with tailoring rules. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Supporting non-deterministic collations with tailoring rules.
Date
Msg-id bc564aed-30c8-44b3-a960-1d0bc090e2fd@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Supporting non-deterministic collations with tailoring rules.  ("Daniel Verite" <daniel@manitou-mail.org>)
Responses Re: Supporting non-deterministic collations with tailoring rules.
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 24.09.25 12:17, Daniel Verite wrote:
> To me, the most plausible fix on the Postgres side would be to pass
> UCOL_DEFAULT instead of UCOL_DEFAULT_STRENGTH as in the attached,
> which lets the user specify the strength in the rule, as the OP did in [1].

With this change, I don't see that the bug reported in ICU-22456 is 
fixed.  See attached my test case.

What change of behavior are you expecting from your patch?  Should there 
be test cases?
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping schema changes in publication
Next
From: jinbinge
Date:
Subject: Re:Re: Odd code around ginScanToDelete