Hi,
On 2023-06-09 13:26, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/9/23 1:15 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 10:57:55AM +0900, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
>>> (Excuse me for cutting in, and this is not directly related to the
>>> thread.)
>>> +1. I'm interested in the feature.
>>>
>>> This is just a example and it probable be useful for other users.
>>> IMO, at
>>> least, it's better to improve the specification that "Extension"
>>> wait event type has only the "Extension" wait event.
>>
>> I hope that nobody would counter-argue you here. In my opinion, we
>> should just introduce an API that allows extensions to retrieve wait
>> event numbers that are allocated by the backend under
>> PG_WAIT_EXTENSION, in a fashion similar to GetNamedLWLockTranche().
>> Say something like:
>> int GetExtensionWaitEvent(const char *wait_event_name);
>
> +1, that's something I've in mind to work on once/if this patch is/get
> committed.
Thanks for replying. If you are ok, I'll try to make a patch
to allow extensions to define custom wait events.
Regards,
--
Masahiro Ikeda
NTT DATA CORPORATION
