On 8/12/25 10:40, Bob Jolliffe wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 at 17:14, Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
> <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>> wrote:
> The solution is to use a more capable storage platform.
>
>
> That is an interesting point you make Adrian. S3 seems quite popular
> for this type of archiving. What would you suggest as a more capable
Yes but from here:
https://pgbackrest.org/user-guide-rhel.html#s3-support
File creation time in S3 is relatively slow so backup/restore
performance is improved by enabling file bundling.
Where file bundling is explained here:
https://pgbackrest.org/user-guide-rhel.html#backup/bundle
Though I don't think would help in this case.
> (and cost effective) storage platform?
I would say anything that does not use object storage and instead uses
block storage, so you are not doing the conversion. I have no specific
recommendations as this is not something I do, archive to the cloud.
>
> Regards
> Bob
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
