> Yes, I pushed the document_overhead_by_track_planning.patch, but this
> CF entry is for pgss_lwlock_v1.patch which replaces spinlocks with lwlocks
> in pg_stat_statements. The latter patch has not been committed yet.
> Probably attachding the different patches in the same thread would cause
> this confusing thing... Anyway, thanks for your comment!
To avoid further confusion, I attached the rebased version of
the patch that was registered at CF. I'd appreciate it if
you review this version.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
