Re: So, about that cast-to-typmod-minus-one business - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From DEVOPS_WwIT
Subject Re: So, about that cast-to-typmod-minus-one business
Date
Msg-id bb6ef23b-25aa-f7e5-dc5b-4eb1cd604296@ww-it.cn
Whole thread Raw
In response to So, about that cast-to-typmod-minus-one business  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
+1 backporting

Tony

On 2021/9/19 01:06, Tom Lane wrote:
> We had left it as an open issue whether or not to risk back-patching
> 5c056b0c2 into stable branches [1].  While updating the v14 release notes,
> I realized that we can't put off that decision any longer, because we
> have to decide now whether to document that as a new behavior in v14.
>
> I'm inclined to back-patch, since nobody has complained about this
> in 14beta3.  Thoughts?
>
>             regards, tom lane
>
> [1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CABNQVagu3bZGqiTjb31a8D5Od3fUMs7Oh3gmZMQZVHZ%3DuWWWfQ%40mail.gmail.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Corey Huinker
Date:
Subject: Undocumented AT TIME ZONE INTERVAL syntax
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical replication timeout problem