Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jose Arthur Benetasso Villanova
Subject Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN
Date
Msg-id bab1b53-9cff-707-c38f-9151c3ea443b@benetasso.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN  (Andrey Borodin <amborodin86@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023, Andrey Borodin wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 8:05 PM Andrey Borodin <amborodin86@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Please find the attached new version. In this patchset heapallindexed
>> flag is removed from GIN checks.
>>
> Uh... sorry, git-formatted wrong branch.
> Here's the correct version. Double checked.
>

Hello again.

I applied the patch without errors / warnings and did the same tests. All 
working as expected.

The only thing that I found is the gin_index_parent_check function in docs 
still references the "gin_index_parent_check(index regclass, 
heapallindexed boolean) returns void"

--
Jose Arthur Benetasso Villanova



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix pg_publication_tables to exclude generated columns
Next
From: Nitin Jadhav
Date:
Subject: Fix GUC_NO_SHOW_ALL test scenario in 003_check_guc.pl