Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
Date
Msg-id b99734a7-4e40-af77-054a-b6c1409d9ef1@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 6/17/16 9:26 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm comfortable with that.  Feel free to make it so, unless you want
>> me to do it for some reason.
>
> Time is short, so I did this.

With that, I think it would be preferable to undo the context-hiding
dance in the tests, as in the attached patch, no?

--
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Whether to back-patch fix for aggregate transtype width estimates
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered