Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Opteron vs Xeon (Was: What to do with 6 disks?) - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Mike Rylander
Subject Re: Opteron vs Xeon (Was: What to do with 6 disks?)
Date
Msg-id b918cf3d050420111114bc840a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Opteron vs Xeon (Was: What to do with 6 disks?)  ("Anjan Dave" <adave@vantage.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Tree view 
On 4/20/05, Anjan Dave <adave@vantage.com> wrote:
> In terms of vendor specific models -
>
> Does anyone have any good/bad experiences/recommendations for a 4-way
> Opteron from Sun (v40z, 6 internal drives) or HP (DL585 5 internal
> drives) models?

We are going with the 90nm HPs for production.  They "feel" like
beefier boxes than the Suns, but the Suns cost a LOT less, IIRC.
We're only using the internal drives for the OS.  PG gets access to a
fibre-channel array, HP StorageWorks 3000.  I _can't wait_ to get this
in.

Our dev box is a 130nm DL585 with 16G of RAM and an HP SCSI array, and
I have absolutely zero complaints.  :)

--
Mike Rylander
mrylander@gmail.com
GPLS -- PINES Development
Database Developer
http://open-ils.org

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Opteron vs Xeon (Was: What to do with 6 disks?)
Next
From: "Joel Fradkin"
Date:
Subject: Re: Opteron vs Xeon (Was: What to do with 6 disks?)