Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mike Rylander
Subject Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?)
Date
Msg-id b918cf3d04100307495428fe3e@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Not that my 2c is worth 1c, but I second this.  I'd rather initdb now
than get bitten by some catalog difference when I move my DB into
production. :)

--miker

On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 14:22:50 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
[...]
> 
> > I'd prefer if all users of 8.0 were guaranteed to have the same catalog.
> 
> Well, there's something to be said for that viewpoint too.  Anyone else
> feel the same?
[...]


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1
Next
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: OT moving from MS SQL to PostgreSQL