Re: Foreign key joins revisited - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joel Jacobson
Subject Re: Foreign key joins revisited
Date
Msg-id b8f75897-5bed-4056-90bb-2c2d2e3f9491@www.fastmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Foreign key joins revisited  ("Joel Jacobson" <joel@compiler.org>)
Responses Re: Foreign key joins revisited
Re: Foreign key joins revisited
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021, at 19:33, Sascha Kuhl wrote:
> The Syntax is great. Which language does it come from. I consider it not german. But I understand it mathematically.
> Great extension.

It doesn't come from any language. But I've seen similar features in ORMs, such as the jOOQ Java project. [1]

Actually, I think jOOQ's "ON KEY" terminology might be something to take inspiration from.
In jOOQ, it's a Java method .onKey(), but I think it would look nice in SQL too:

    LEFT JOIN role r ON KEY p.permission_role_id_fkey

I think it would be nice if we could simply using dot "." instead of "->" or whatever.
I think it should be possible since "ON KEY" would avoid any ambiguity in how to interpret what comes after.
We would know "permission_role_id_fkey" is a foreign key name and not a column.
Or is the grammar too sensitive for such creativity?


/Joel

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication
Next
From: Sascha Kuhl
Date:
Subject: Re: Foreign key joins revisited