Re: Online enabling of checksums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Online enabling of checksums
Date
Msg-id b87e9f3f-a647-571d-2168-bc5d48e1ff5b@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Online enabling of checksums  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Online enabling of checksums
Re: Online enabling of checksums
List pgsql-hackers
On 07/31/2018 12:45 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> Hi!,
>>
>> Thanks for reviewing, I’ve updated the patch with the above mentioned incorrect
>> linkends as well as fixed the comments you made in a previous review.
>>
>> The CF-builder-bot is red, but it’s because it’s trying to apply the already
>> committed patch which is in the attached datallowconn thread.
> I think checksumhelper_cost_delay should be checksum_helper_cost_delay.
>                                                      ^
>
> Is "helper" the right word?

Based on other terminology within the postgresql.conf should it be 
"checksum_worker_cost_delay"?

JD

>

-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
***  A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is.  ***
PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org
*****     Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.   *****



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Online enabling of checksums
Next
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: GiST VACUUM