Re: query_id, pg_stat_activity, extended query protocol - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrei Lepikhov
Subject Re: query_id, pg_stat_activity, extended query protocol
Date
Msg-id b7470e80-7f95-4cdb-a711-3938df54a662@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: query_id, pg_stat_activity, extended query protocol  ("Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: query_id, pg_stat_activity, extended query protocol
List pgsql-hackers
On 27/4/2024 20:54, Imseih (AWS), Sami wrote:
>> But simplistic case with a prepared statement shows how the value of
>> queryId can be changed if you don't acquire all the objects needed for
>> the execution:
> 
> 
>> CREATE TABLE test();
>> PREPARE name AS SELECT * FROM test;
>> EXPLAIN (ANALYSE, VERBOSE, COSTS OFF) EXECUTE name;
>> DROP TABLE test;
>> CREATE TABLE test();
>> EXPLAIN (ANALYSE, VERBOSE, COSTS OFF) EXECUTE name;
> 
> Hmm, you raise a good point. Isn't this a fundamental problem
> with prepared statements? If there is DDL on the
> relations of the prepared statement query, shouldn't the prepared
> statement be considered invalid at that point and raise an error
> to the user?
I don't think so. It may be any object, even stored procedure, that can 
be changed. IMO, the right option here is to report zero (like the 
undefined value of queryId) until the end of the parsing stage.

-- 
regards, Andrei Lepikhov




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands
Next
From: Andy Fan
Date:
Subject: Re: using extended statistics to improve join estimates