Re: User documentation vs Official Docs - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Rob Sargent
Subject Re: User documentation vs Official Docs
Date
Msg-id b6c810b7-00a2-c534-67e7-ccf028fe8394@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: User documentation vs Official Docs  ("Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at>)
Responses Re: User documentation vs Official Docs  ("Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at>)
List pgsql-general

On 07/19/2018 11:04 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2018-07-18 08:09:35 +1000, Tim Cross wrote:
>> If using web widgets to author content on the wiki is the main
>> impediment for contributing content, maybe we should see if the wiki
>> provides alternative access methods. I've used wikis in the past which
>> allowed users to upload content via xmlrpc, api etc. Perhaps something
>> similar could be made available for those making significant
>> contributions or to a select few 'curators' who could accept content
>> from others.
> There are also browser plugins like It's all text, textern, wasavi, etc.
> which allow the user to use a real text editor instead of a text area.
>
>          hp
>
Keep in mind that Chrome broke "It's all text" compatibility, at least 
with emacs and now it's done via "Edit with Emacs".  This in my 
experience is a step backwards from "It's all text".



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: functions with side effect
Next
From: "Peter J. Holzer"
Date:
Subject: Re: User documentation vs Official Docs