On 22.06.22 01:34, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 09:03:23AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 09:24:56AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> I don't feel very strongly about this. It makes sense to stay consistent
>>> with the existing COPY code.
>>
>> Yes, my previous argument is based on consistency with the
>> surroundings. I am not saying that this could not be made better, it
>> surely can, but I would recommend to tackle that in a separate patch,
>> and apply that to more areas than this specific one.
>
> Peter, beta2 is planned for next week. Do you think that you would be
> able to address this open item by the end of this week? If not, and I
> have already looked at the proposed patch, I can jump in and help.
The latest patch was posted by you, so I was deferring to you to commit
it. Would you like me to do it?
