Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Document the order of changing certain settingswhen using hot-standby servers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Document the order of changing certain settingswhen using hot-standby servers
Date
Msg-id b5f57e20-c641-9aa5-8b57-185797fde644@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Document the order of changing certain settingswhen using hot-standby servers  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 9/1/17 13:00, Robert Haas wrote:
> Now you're proposing to add:
> 
>     If you want to increase these values you
>     should do so on all standby servers first, before applying the changes to
>     the primary. If you instead want to decrease these values you should do so
>     on the primary first, before applying the changes to all standby servers.
> 
> But that's just the obvious logical consequence of the existing statement.
> 
> If we're going to add this text, I'd move it one sentence earlier and
> stick "Therefore, " at the beginning.

Committed incorporating that suggestion.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Walsender timeouts and large transactions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Account for cost and selectivity of HAVING quals