On 13/1/22 5:06 μ.μ., Ron wrote:
> On 1/13/22 8:15 AM, Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
>> On 13/1/22 4:12 μ.μ., Kenneth Marshall wrote:
>>>>> Hi Achilleas,
>>>>> I would go with version B - since as I understand it's ISV
>>>>> solution. Meaning the postgres ddl was tested and aligned with the
>>>>> application layer, otherwise you would need to fix app layer after
>>>>> the migration.
>>>> Dziekuje Alicija. The powerbuilder app is in-house developed, source
>>>> is available, what could be wrong with the app? Browsing through the
>>>> powerbuilder source I don't see (by eye) anything that could break
>>>> something in PgSQL.
>>>> --
>>>> Achilleas Mantzios
>>>> DBA, Analyst, IT Lead
>>>> IT DEPT
>>>> Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
>>> Hi Achilleas,
>>>
>>> If the schema and usage is straight-forward, I would recommend using
>>> ora2pg to give you an estimation cost for your migration by letting you
>>> know what cannot be automatically translated. Once you have that you
>>> will be better informed as to the work needed.
>> Thank you Ken!
>
> ora2pg worked perfectly for us in migrating 8TB of Oracle 11 data and simple triggers to Pg 12.
wow! Thank you!
--
Achilleas Mantzios
DBA, Analyst, IT Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
