Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions
Date
Msg-id b547f27f-d40b-0250-93ff-d8d73194506f@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 5/20/16 7:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I guess my first question is whether we have consensus on the release
> into which we should put this.  Some people (Noah, among others)
> thought it should wait because we're after feature freeze, while
> others thought we should do it now.  If we're going to try to get this
> into 9.6, I'll work on reviewing this sooner rather than later, but if
> we're not going to do that I'm going to postpone dealing with it until
> after we branch.

Sounds to me that this is part of the cleanup of a 9.6 feature and 
should be in that release.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: what to revert
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions