Re: Checks in RegisterBackgroundWorker.() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On 25/08/2023 00:00, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 3:15 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
>> In summary, RegisterBackgroundWorker() is doing some questionable and
>> useless work, when a shared preload library is loaded to a backend
>> process in EXEC_BACKEND mode.
> 
> Yeah.  When I was working on 7389aad6 ("Use WaitEventSet API for
> postmaster's event loop."), I also tried to move all of the
> postmaster's state variables into PostmasterContext (since the only
> reason for that scope was the signal handler code that is now gone),
> and I hit a variant of this design problem.  I wonder if that would be
> unblocked by this...
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+hUKGKH_RPAo=NgPfHKj--565aL1qiVpUGdWt1_pmJehY+dmw@mail.gmail.com

A-ha, yes I believe this patch will unblock that. 
RegisterBackgroundWorker() has no legit reason to access 
BackgroundWorkerList in child processes, and with these patches, it no 
longer does.

-- 
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)