On Sat, 2025-09-13 at 17:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> writes:
> > I came up with the attached patch set.
>
> I did some more work on the comments, adjusted a couple of places that
> could be simplified, and pushed it.
Thank you!
> > I used two separate patches for clarity and ease of review, but both
> > should get backpatched.
>
> I didn't really love the "fix it and then explain it afterward"
> approach. It's hard to review a patch if you don't understand the
> logic. I considered swapping the order of the two patches, but
> eventually just merged them into one.
Yes, having the refactoring patch first might have been better.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
