Re: Verify a record has a column in a plpgsql trigger - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: Verify a record has a column in a plpgsql trigger
Date
Msg-id b42b73151002041113j6b791d1co5cf9c48143309bbd@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Verify a record has a column in a plpgsql trigger  (Mike Ginsburg <mginsburg@collaborativefusion.com>)
Responses Re: Verify a record has a column in a plpgsql trigger  (Mike Ginsburg <mginsburg@collaborativefusion.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Mike Ginsburg
<mginsburg@collaborativefusion.com> wrote:
> I have a plpgsql function that serves as a change log for a few tables in my
> db (8.4.2).  In most of the tables that I am logging, there is an "editor"
> column that stores the ID of the user who made the change, so as part of the
> function I set
>
> editor := NEW.editor;
>
> There are a few of the tables that don't store editor, in which case I am ok
> with inserting it into the log as NULL.  The problem is I can't seem to come
> up with a conditional to see if NEW has a column named "editor".

There's no way to do query now/old for columns directly in pl/pgsql.
Some alternatives:

1) use begin/exception/end to try and set it, and catch the error.
would likely be the best route but be aware that functions with
exception handlers have a higher cost than those without
2) query system catalogs or information schema
3) build a cache (a list of tables that support editor in a table you query)

If it was me, I'd do #3 if performance was critical, otherwise #1.

merlin

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Scott Mead
Date:
Subject: Re: How to set default database
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Any Good Postgresql Courses Offered in the US Area?