Re: query planning different in plpgsql? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: query planning different in plpgsql?
Date
Msg-id b42b73150910260619l7727208v3dce371aaec6a562@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: query planning different in plpgsql?  (Michal J. Kubski <michal.kubski@cdt.pl>)
Responses Re: query planning different in plpgsql?  (Michal J. Kubski <michal.kubski@cdt.pl>)
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Michal J. Kubski <michal.kubski@cdt.pl> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:56:36 +0100, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
> <gryzman@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Scott Mead
>> <scott.lists@enterprisedb.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   Do you not have an index on last_snapshot.domain_id?
>>>
>>
>> that, and also try rewriting a query as JOIN. There might be difference
> in
>> performance/plan.
>>
> Thanks, it runs better (average 240s, not 700s) with the index. Rewriting
> queries
> as JOINs does not make any difference.
> The last_snapshot is a temp table created earlier in the procedure
> and the query in question is preceded with CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE as well,
> not a cursor.
> I still do not get why it performs differently inside the procedure.
> Is there any way to see what planning decisions were made?

not directly....can we see the function?

merlin

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Michal J. Kubski
Date:
Subject: Re: query planning different in plpgsql?
Next
From: Michal J. Kubski
Date:
Subject: Re: query planning different in plpgsql?