Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf
Date
Msg-id b42b73150903301250x676a7282r647f2b7abe2138d7@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> I guess that'd work but it might be overkill.
>
> The real bottom line is that *all* the proposals for generic init
> functions are overkill.  We have no evidence that we need one and
> no certainty about what the requirements for it would be if we did.
>
> I think we should just do PQinitOpenSSL(2 args) and be done with it.

I was pushing for generic PQinit, but have come around and agree with
this point of view.

merlin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Unexpected Result in Windowing
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf