Re: Controlling hot standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: Controlling hot standby
Date
Msg-id b42b73150901230705q526edf10ob0aaf38a4f95a835@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Controlling hot standby  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Controlling hot standby  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/23/09, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>  >
>  > On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 12:58 +0200, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
>  > > On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 10:05 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
>  > > > I'll add it now, default = on.
>  > >
>  > > Did you mean "off"?
>  >
>  > No, do you?
>
>
> Depends on the setting :-)  It is "hot_standby=off" by default, right?
>  I think having a double negative "disable_hot_standby=off" would be
>  awkward.

Is 'hot standby' going to be the official moniker for the feature?
(not 'standby replication', or something else?).  I wonder if we
should pick something more descriptive.

merlin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: AIX 4.3 getaddrinfo busted
Next
From: Sam Mason
Date:
Subject: Re: deductive databases in postgreSQL