On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I'm wondering why the hooks need names at all. AFAICS all that
> libpq needs to know about a hook is a callback function address
> and a void * passthrough pointer.
For reference...here is what libpqtypes has to do to bind via the
hooking interface:
http://libpqtypes.esilo.com/browse_source.html?file=hooks.c
Are you proposing something substantially different (not my handle
suggestion)? How would it work exactly?
merlin
