Re: 8.2 beta blockers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: 8.2 beta blockers
Date
Msg-id b42b73150609181305k4a325102v3ba51c82f37b9f40@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.2 beta blockers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 9/18/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> Is UserLocks a cool enough feature to be worth mentioning in the 8.2 PR?
>
> > Probably not.
>
> Especially not since the capability has been there right along.

I disagree, almost nobody knows about them, due to lousy name and lack
of documentation.  I think the pr hook should be merited to their
general usefullness, previous implementation notwithstanding.
techinally, we added a wait version too, right?  8.1 table
partitioning was dressed up inheritance right? :)  (not quite the
same, i know but...)

merlin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.2 beta blockers
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.2 beta blockers