Re: PITR performance overhead? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: PITR performance overhead?
Date
Msg-id b42b73150608011817s67612f90n6c7940868fc6082b@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PITR performance overhead?  ("George Pavlov" <gpavlov@mynewplace.com>)
Responses Re: PITR performance overhead?  ("Denis Lussier" <denisl@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On 8/1/06, George Pavlov <gpavlov@mynewplace.com> wrote:
> I am looking for some general guidelines on what is the performance
> overhead of enabling point-in-time recovery (archive_command config) on
> an 8.1 database. Obviously it will depend on a multitude of factors, but
> some broad-brush statements and/or anecdotal evidence will suffice.
> Should one worry about its performance implications? Also, what can one
> do to mitigate it?

pitr is extremely cheap both in performance drag and administation
overhead for the benefits it provides.  it comes almost for free, just
make sure you can handle all the wal files and do sane backup
scheduling.  in fact, pitr can actually reduce the load on a server
due to running less frequent backups.  if your server is heavy i/o
loaded, it might take a bit of planning.

merlin

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: XFS filessystem for Datawarehousing
Next
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: XFS filessystem for Datawarehousing