Re: User documentation vs Official Docs - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Thomas Kellerer
Subject Re: User documentation vs Official Docs
Date
Msg-id b3dd87e8-64df-a9ff-8a17-ad02ecc95594@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to User documentation vs Official Docs  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
Joshua D. Drake schrieb am 16.07.2018 um 22:32:
> -general.
> 
> Over the last year as I have visited many meetups and interacted with
> people at conferences etc... There are three prevailing issues that
> continue to come up in contributing to the community. This email is
> about one of them. Where is the "user" documentation? The official
> documentation is awesome, if you know what you are doing. It is not
> particularly useful for HOWTO style docs. There is some user
> documentation in the wiki but let's be honest, writing a
> blog/article/howto in a wiki is a pain in the butt.
> 
> What does the community think about a community run, community
> organized, sub project for USER documentation? This type of
> documentation would be things like, "10 steps to configure
> replication", "Dumb simple Postgres backups",  "5 things to NEVER do
> with Postgres". I imagine we would sort it by version (9.6/10.0
> etc...) as well as break it down via type (Administration, Tuning,
> Gotchas) etc...


What about: https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/PostgreSQL


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: User documentation vs Official Docs
Next
From: Benjamin Scherrey
Date:
Subject: Re: User documentation vs Official Docs