Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?
Date
Msg-id b3624e34-bc92-381e-1e65-b2b34304a927@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PL_stashcache, or, what's our minimum Perl version?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 7/31/17 16:54, Tom Lane wrote:
> Maybe "which" isn't the best tool for the job, not sure.

Yeah, "which" is not portable.  This would need a bit more work and
portability testing.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] AlterUserStmt anmd RoleSpec rules in grammar.y
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail