Re: random_page_cost vs ssd? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andrej
Subject Re: random_page_cost vs ssd?
Date
Msg-id b35603930903111204l6825f931kf67183f7c48971fe@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: random_page_cost vs ssd?  (Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>)
Responses Re: random_page_cost vs ssd?  (Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>)
List pgsql-performance
2009/3/12 Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>:
> [...snip...].    All tests start with 'cat 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches', and work on
>  a 32GB data set (40% of the disk).
What's the content of '3' above?

--
Please don't top post, and don't use HTML e-Mail :}  Make your quotes concise.

http://www.american.edu/econ/notes/htmlmail.htm

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Carey
Date:
Subject: Re: random_page_cost vs ssd?
Next
From: Frank Joerdens
Date:
Subject: Full statement logging problematic on larger machines?