Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andrej Ricnik-Bay
Subject Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
Date
Msg-id b35603930706292127u54938341q49a057f57ce9e793@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On 6/30/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Hmm ... I fear Oracle's behavior is more correct, because if any
> argument is null (ie, unknown), then who can say what the greatest or
> least value is?  It's unknown (ie, null).  But I suspect our behavior
> is more useful.  Comments?
But in min/max scenarios NULL values are simply ignored, too,
no?

>                         regards, tom lane
Cheers,
Andrej

--
Please don't top post, and don't use HTML e-Mail :}  Make your quotes concise.

http://www.american.edu/econ/notes/htmlmail.htm

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
Next
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres