On 2020-12-15 23:13, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Do we really want to carry around confusing syntax for compatibility? I
> doubt we would ever add INTO now, even for compatibility.
Right, we would very likely not add it now. But it doesn't seem to
cause a lot of ongoing maintenance burden, so if there is a use case,
it's not unreasonable to keep it around. I have no other motive here, I
was just curious.
