Re: dblink Future support vs FDW - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: dblink Future support vs FDW
Date
Msg-id b2bc5ffe-4b00-4266-9f86-fc25309e62f1@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to dblink Future support vs FDW  (Dhritman Roy <dhritman.roy@NetCracker.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 6/27/24 08:32, Dhritman Roy wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> This is my attempt to seek support at PostGreSQL.
>
> I know we can use FDW but our teams are right now considering dblink ( 
> it seems it is more performant when compared to FDW ) and we obviously 
> do not want to end up in a situation where we develop something in few 
> months and then we find that the PostGreSQL support is ending with a new 
> version.

I would say that is highly unlikely. Even if it where to happen at some 
point in the distant future you still have:


https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=tree;f=contrib/dblink;h=03de20165973a346e2ce8e3c7fdfb11448487dd6;hb=HEAD

Open source code under a permissive license that you could keep running 
with.

> 
> Any information/pointers related to future of dblink will be very useful 
> for us and highly appreciated.
> 
> Regards
> 
> ROY.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information transmitted herein is intended only for the person or 
> entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, 
> proprietary and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, 
> dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, 
> this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
> recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact 
> the sender and delete the material from any computer.
> 

-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Alignment check
Next
From: Marthin Laubscher
Date:
Subject: Re: Alignment check