Re: Re: Re: reorganizing partitioning code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: Re: Re: reorganizing partitioning code
Date
Msg-id b2b59230-d5d1-496a-c004-512c59750db7@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: reorganizing partitioning code  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Re: Re: reorganizing partitioning code
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Amit,

On 3/2/18 11:17 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 11:53 PM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
>> Hi Amit,
>>
>> On 2/16/18 3:36 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>>>
>>> Attached updated version.
>>
>> This patch no longer applies and the conflicts do not appear to be trivial.
>>
>> I'm a bit confused about your comment in [1]:
>>
>>> I gave up on rebasing this patch yesterday as I couldn't finish it in
>>> 5 minutes, but maybe I will try later this month.  Gotta focus on
>>> thefaster pruning stuff for now...
>>
>> How much later are we talking about?
> 
> Sorry about the confusing comment.  It could be sometime later half of
> the next week.

We are now three weeks into the CF with no new patch.

Are you planning to update this patch?  If not, I think it should be
marked as Returned with Feedback and submitted to the next CF once it
has been updated.

Regards,
-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: constraint exclusion and nulls in IN (..) clause
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping