Re: to_date_valid() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: to_date_valid()
Date
Msg-id b28373f4-7e37-3bc4-25a5-65aef4006cf0@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: to_date_valid()  (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
Responses Re: to_date_valid()  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 7/5/16 4:24 AM, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> But notwithstanding your feeling that you would like your application
> to break if it makes use of this behaviour, it is a change that might
> make some people pretty unhappy - nobody can tell how many.

What is the use of the existing behavior?  You get back an arbitrary
implementation dependent value.  We don't even guarantee what the value
will be.  If we changed it to return a different implementation
dependent value, would users get upset?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vik Fearing
Date:
Subject: Re: PoC: Make it possible to disallow WHERE-less UPDATE and DELETE
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in joinrels.c