Hi Filip,
> 7% is an interesting improvement for these cases. I see it as a nice
> feature,
> What about adding a GUC variable to have the ability to configure
> PQ_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE based on the user's needs?
Well, currently this is just the array size as a preprocessor macro,
so the executables .bss gets sized differently.
For a GUC quite some more code, including dynamical allocation
_and reallocation_ would be needed -- and this complexity I wanted
to avoid for the first discussion.
If a GUC fits the usage patterns better, I'm okay with it!
