Re: [PERFORM] Performance on Win32 vs Cygwin - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Kevin Barnard
Subject Re: [PERFORM] Performance on Win32 vs Cygwin
Date
Msg-id b068057c0410191509fcc50c@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-general
Have you looked at the 7.3 configuration file vs. the 8.0.  It's
possible that the 7.3 file is tweakled better then the 8.0.  Have you
anaylzed the tables after loading the data into 8.0


On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:01:38 -0500, MikeSmialek2@Hotmail.com
<mikesmialek2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are experiencing slow performance on 8 Beta 2 Dev3 on Win32 and are
> trying to determine why. Any info is appreciated.
>
> We have a Web Server and a DB server both running Win2KServer with all
> service packs and critical updates.
>
> An ASP page on the Web Server hits the DB Server with a simple query that
> returns 205 rows and makes the ASP page delivered to the user about 350K.
>
> On an ethernet lan a client pc perceives just under 1 sec performance with
> the following DB Server configuration:
>     PIII 550Mhz
>     256MB RAM
>     7200 RPM HD
>     cygwin
>     Postgresql 7.1.3
>     PGODBC 7.3.2
>
> We set up another DB Server with 8 beta (same Web Server, same network, same
> client pc) and now the client pc perceives response of just over 3 sec with
> the following DB server config:
>     PIII 700 Mhz
>     448MB RAM
>     7200 RPM HD
>     8 Beta 2 Dev3 on Win32  running as a service
>
> Is the speed decrease because it's a beta?
> Is the speed decrease because it's running on Win instead of cygwin?
>
> We did not install cygwin on the new DB Server.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: How do I recover from>> pg_xlog/0000000000000000 (log file 0, segment 0) failed: No such file or directory
Next
From: Kevin Barnard
Date:
Subject: Re: reusing column labels in select