Sorry, I've spent much time examining this in detail, so if I neglected the
* in the transcript I pasted you, it still doesn't matter. There is a .1
version (see my transcript below), BUT THAT'S IT . So my original
argument is still unanswered: there are still extra files on production
that aren't coming over in the standby : it's the .2 and .3 that I don't
want in the production DB. I have this pattern acros several large tables
and it's costing us disk space...
$ oid2name -d EBPRDS1 -t users
Oid of table users from database "EBPRDS1":
_______________________________
3828262123 = users
$ ls -l 3828262123*
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 1073741824 Dec 18 23:08 3828262123
-rw------- 1 postgres postgres 558899200 Dec 18 23:16 3828262123.1
"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote in message
news:15552.1040274982@sss.pgh.pa.us...
> HT Levine <htlevine@ebates.com> writes:
> > For example, here is the oid2name dump of a table called users on
> > PRODUCTION:
> > $ oid2name -d EBPRD1 -t users
> > Oid of table users from database "EBPRD1":
> > _______________________________
> > 17260 = users
> > $ ls -l 17260*
> > -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 1073741824 Dec 18 17:48 17260
> > -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 1073741824 Dec 18 17:48 17260.1
> > -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 1073741824 Dec 18 17:48 17260.2
> > -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 165445632 Dec 18 17:51 17260.3
>
> > but the same table on the standby DB yields this:
>
> > $ oid2name -d EBPRDS1 -t users
> > Oid of table users from database "EBPRDS1":
> > _______________________________
> > 3828262123 = users
> > $ ls -l 3828262123
> > -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 1073741824 Dec 18 16:55 3828262123
>
> And? Your transcript does not prove that there's not 3828262123.1 and
> so forth ... given that 3828262123 is a full 1Gb, I'd be willing to bet
> lunch that 3828262123.1 exists too ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
