Re: Compression of bigger WAL records - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Compression of bigger WAL records
Date
Msg-id ascWtOql0xSrFetW@paquier.xyz
Whole thread
In response to Re: Compression of bigger WAL records  (Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>)
Responses Re: Compression of bigger WAL records
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 08, 2026 at 08:53:17AM +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> 0001 reuses the compression context on WAL insertion. I restored the
> fallback to an uncompressed image if context allocation fails, rather
> than risking a PANIC in a critical section.

Thanks.  Will look at this one next, even if I don't think that I will
have much to say.  I was wondering about some micro-benchmarking to
reduce the amount of noise to zero, even if that would just be testing
an equivalent of native zstd...
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Two more RI fast-path issues
Next
From: Manu
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix doc: explanation of how postgres works when OOM killer is invoked