Re: small cleanup for s_lock.h - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: small cleanup for s_lock.h
Date
Msg-id arq3_vD_TSGBhhtQ@nathan
Whole thread
In response to Re: small cleanup for s_lock.h  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 04:03:30PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> I've committed v5-{0001,0002} and attached a rebased version of 0003.
> Besides fixing some small things discovered during LLM review, I decided to
> remove the restriction that only one of TAS or S_LOCK can be defined.
> Having both doesn't break anything; we just use the platform's S_LOCK in
> that case.

I've now committed 0003.

-- 
nathan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Fire create_upper_paths_hook for UPPERREL_PARTIAL_GROUP_AGG
Next
From: Daria Lepikhova
Date:
Subject: Incremental backups report progress as if they were full backups