Re: [Proposal] Expose internal MultiXact member count function for efficient monitoring - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: [Proposal] Expose internal MultiXact member count function for efficient monitoring
Date
Msg-id arKi8Jdv8EwASlgZ@nathan
Whole thread
In response to Re: [Proposal] Expose internal MultiXact member count function for efficient monitoring  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Responses Catversion bumps during beta (was Re: [Proposal] Expose internal MultiXact member count function for efficient monitoring)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 09:58:38AM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 4:01 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> That would be OK here.  CC-ing Nathan for RMT input, as this would
>> require a catversion bump.
> 
> I don't have an issue with a catversion bump as long as it's before GA
> and it doesn't make it more likely we'll have to change it again after
> GA.

Same.  I'd think before RC1 would be preferable.

-- 
nathan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Direct TOAST v2, faster, smaller and no migration needed
Next
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: System views for versions reporting