Re: Logical Implication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: Logical Implication
Date
Msg-id ar0mGmQQz6vI6pts@nathan
Whole thread
In response to Re: Logical Implication  (Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 11:51:39PM +0200, Vik Fearing wrote:
> On 29/09/2026 22:23, Zsolt Parragi wrote:
>> And +1 for using %nonassoc instead
> 
> That's three now.  I'll prepare a new patch.

Thanks.  One other thing I'd like to explore a bit more is whether to make
IMPLIES "round-trippable," at least to see how much more complicated it
would be.  (I'm happy to do this part BTW). 

-- 
nathan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Narayanan Venkateswaran
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication
Next
From: Radim Marek
Date:
Subject: Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) might keep dropped-column data