On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 06:53:58PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 04/09/2026 22:30, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, you have a point. There's pretty nearly nothing that's
>> well-designed about CREATE SCHEMA subcommands: as you say, the syntax
>> is shaky, and the namespace visible to subcommands is unclear, and
>> the whole business of re-ordering subcommands is debatable, and even
>> if all those things were fixed the benefit of the entire feature is
>> marginal. So maybe we should just say that our legacy implementation
>> is what it is and we will mark it deprecated rather than putting any
>> effort into improving it. I'd like to see more than one vote in favor
>> of that before I do it, though.
>
> Reverting seems like the safest thing to do. This is a really niche thing,
> but whatever behavior we pick, we'll be stuck with it for a long time. If
> we're not 100% certain about the new behavior, better to take a step back
> and discuss and design it with more time.
+1
--
nathan
