Re: Routed ON CONFLICT inserts broken by partition-local deferrable unique constraints in 19 and master - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Álvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Routed ON CONFLICT inserts broken by partition-local deferrable unique constraints in 19 and master
Date
Msg-id aq1On2pG5-NHvF4e@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread
In response to Re: Routed ON CONFLICT inserts broken by partition-local deferrable unique constraints in 19 and master  (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2026-Sep-18, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:

> Yes, I get that. But the way how comment is written seems to emphasize
> interchangeability of indexes in general, mentioning REINDEX
> CONCURRENTLY as one use case, but not necessarily the only one -- or at
> least it's my reading of it. Maybe a better commentary can solve it, but
> since it's already pushed, consider it to be an optional nit pick.

I'll gladly take your nit pick.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
<inflex> really, I see PHP as like a strange amalgamation of C, Perl, Shell
<crab> inflex: you know that "amalgam" means "mixture with mercury",
       more or less, right?
<crab> i.e., "deadly poison"



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reject nonpositive Bloom filter element estimates
Next
From: "Tristan Partin"
Date:
Subject: Re: Add ASCII fast path to Unicode normalization functions