Re: what Linux to run - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Rich Shepard
Subject Re: what Linux to run
Date
Msg-id alpine.LNX.2.00.1202281243290.3501@salmo.appl-ecosys.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: what Linux to run  (hamann.w@t-online.de)
Responses Re: what Linux to run  (hamann.w@t-online.de)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, hamann.w@t-online.de wrote:

> one thing you might want to consider is system lifetime: some distro may
> be set up so that you more or less have to reinstall within 2 years, if
> you plan to use update service - others may be longer. Now, fast
> development is great AND allows you to change to better hardware easily.
> It does however mean that you might get surprised with a different
> postgres version at times you dont really like it. If you plan to install
> from source, this would not be of any concern

Wolfgang,

   Most updates fix security vulnerabilities. If you keep current with those
there's not a compelling need to upgrade the distribution itself unless you
want to do so. There's a distinction between the distribution itself
(kernel, and GNU tools) and the end-user applications bundled with the
distribution. Also, the distributions with which I'm familiar allow you to
select the applications to upgrade so you can avoid surprises.

Rich


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "David Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: how to create data on the fly?
Next
From: Bartosz Dmytrak
Date:
Subject: Re: Stored Procedure Record Updates using For Loops - Postgres 8.1