Re: pg_buffercache - A lot of "unnamed" relfilenodes? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Gerhard Wiesinger
Subject Re: pg_buffercache - A lot of "unnamed" relfilenodes?
Date
Msg-id alpine.LFD.2.00.0909262121050.31728@bbs.intern
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_buffercache - A lot of "unnamed" relfilenodes?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_buffercache - A lot of "unnamed" relfilenodes?  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
Re: pg_buffercache - A lot of "unnamed" relfilenodes?  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009, Tom Lane wrote:

> Gerhard Wiesinger <lists@wiesinger.com> writes:
>> Research on the pg_bufferache showed that a lot of pages don't have any
>> assigned relfilenodesin pg_class, even when they are dirty (in this case
>> inserts are done).
>
> There should never be any buffered pages for nonexistent tables.  The
> method you are using will only show relnames for pages belonging to
> tables of the current database ... maybe there are a lot of dirty pages
> for other databases in the cluster?  Or maybe the tables are newly
> created (not committed) and so you can't see their pg_class rows yet?
>

OK, this is a visibility problem of the databases. Is it possible to GRANT
visibility for e.g. one user to all databases for pg_class?

Thnx.

Ciao,
Gerhard

--
http://www.wiesinger.com/


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT... RETURNING with a function
Next
From: Krzysztof Barlik
Date:
Subject: Re: Column names in rowsets returned from function