Re: Linux TOP - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: Linux TOP
Date
Msg-id alpine.GSO.2.01.0910211819500.13048@westnet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Linux TOP  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Linux TOP
List pgsql-general
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Scott Marlowe wrote:

> In this:
>
> Mem:  16432240k total, 16344596k used,    87644k free,    27548k buffers
> Swap: 10241428k total,  3680860k used,  6560568k free,  6230376k cached
>
> The 6.2G cached is considered part of the 16G used
>
> So it's not using more memory than it has.  It's just the accounting
> is inobvious.

This is a snapshot.  The fact that 3.7GB of swap is used here suggests
there may have been more memory used at some point in the past then we're
seeing now; that's more what I was commenting on.  A look at the si/so
figures in vmstat should nail down whether that's still going on or not
now, as Tom already suggested.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux TOP
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux TOP