On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
> He's only got 100MB of shared buffers, which doesn't seem like much
> considering it's apparently a fairly beefy system. I definitely
> don't see how one CPU spinning over the buffer headers in BufferSync
> is going to create the sort of hiccup he's describing.
Agreed, it doesn't seem like a likely cause. If the problem reduces in
magnitude in proportion with the size of the buffer cache, we might have
to accept that's it's true regardless; that's why I was curious to see
what impact that had on the test results.
--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
