Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabien COELHO
Subject Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c?
Date
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.21.1912241418080.3339@pseudo
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bonjour Michaël,

> the syscache mainly, so instead the attached patch does the following
> changes:
> - amapi.h -> indexam.h
> - amapi.c -> indexamapi.c.  Here we have an equivalent in access/table/
> as tableamapi.c.
> - amvalidate.c -> indexamvalidate.c
> - amvalidate.h -> indexamvalidate.h
> - genam.c -> indexgenam.c
>

Patch applies cleanly, compiles, make check-world ok.

The change does not attempt to keep included files in ab order. Should it 
do that, or is it fixed later by some reindentation phase?

-- 
Fabien.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Anastasia Lubennikova
Date:
Subject: Re: Building infrastructure for B-Tree deduplication that recognizeswhen opclass equality is also equivalence
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: weird libpq GSSAPI comment